AI and scientific writing

Artificial intelligence (AI) tools, including generative AI such as large language models (LLMs), can support the research and writing process. At the same time, they carry a risk of "hallucinations" in the form of false statements and fabricated citations. Responsible use and AI literacy are important to benefit from AI while avoiding pitfalls of AI tools. At the same time, authors need to be aware of publishers' policies about AI use and how to declare it.

Below, we list tips that can be a start to achieve better results when working with AI tools, especially for scientific writing. Also have a look for the Further reading section to delve deeper. Beyond tips, we recommend to develop AI literacy. With such AI literacy you have a deeper and more stable foundation to adapt to the quickly changing landscape of AI tools and their capabilities. Finally, check our tool page for writing tools and our training courses. Our courses about scientific publishing (module 2) and about AI in research & scientific writing (module 4), as well as our writing lab all cover aspects of scientific writing and the use of AI in that process.

Tips for using AI tools effectively

Be also aware of our page about publishers' AI policies. These policies directly address certain use cases, such as spell checks and reviewing manuscripts. Also have a look on our dedicated page about AI-supported literature search and its tips for prompting. 

  • Use AI as a tool to support you: AI can assist you in improving your writing, giving you feedback, challenging your thoughts and in developing hypotheses. Be aware, though, that these skills are an important part of a research career and letting AI tools doing them can affect your own skill development in these areas.
  • Take responsibility: AI cannot be an author. Responsibility for mistakes remains only with you and your human coauthors. This includes false claims and fabricated citations. Changes by AI tools can be subtle but impactful: replacing "suggests" with "demonstrates" by an AI tool can have a profound effect on the message of your manuscript.
  • Specificity and context: The more specific your prompts are and the more context you offer, the more specific and relevant answers you can receive.
  • Copyright and data privacy: Familiarize yourself with the data privacy settings of the AI tools you are using and be aware of the data privacy rules and confidentiality rules that apply to material that you upload. Be aware that output you create with AI can violate copyright of others.
  • Check guidelines: If you are using AI tools for scientific writing, be sure to check guidelines from publishers, journals, institutions, supervisors, funders, and so on. These rules can differ and change quickly. For publishers, our dedicated AI and publishing policies page gives a first overview. 

Develop AI literacy

AI tools change quickly, making specific tips outdated frequently. For this reason, AI literacy can be a more lasting foundation for evaluating and safely using AI. The following criteria are modified from Lo L, 2025: AI Literacy: A Guide for Academic Libraries. College & Research Libraries News, 86(3), 120.

  • Technical knowledge: You don't need to be a computer scientist with expert AI knowledge to develop some basic understanding of essential concepts. In turn, this will allow you to better understand the problem of AI hallucinations, evaluate different countermeasures and in general keep up with the pace of AI development.
  • Ethical awareness: The creation and use of AI tools raise many relevant questions. The training of LLMs uses a vast amount of resources, the training datasets of most LLMs contain copyrighted material, AI output can be biased and some AI companies might behave in ways you disagree with. Being aware of such topics – and staying informed about them – will allow you to make informed choices about your own AI use.
  • Critical thinking: Being critical and questioning AI output is a first step. But critical thinking can go a step further for AI literacy by combining it with your technical knowledge and ethical awareness. The following considerations could be the result of such deepened critical thinking: What kind of training data was used and how was it processed? How could this affect the answers you receive? Will it affect factual correctness and introduce bias? What countermeasures have AI companies taken and how might they affect the answers you receive? Do you need an AI for the problem you are trying to solve or could a non-AI approach be sufficient (or even better)?
  • Practical skills: Every tool has a learning curve, and this holds true for AI tools as well. Your AI tool might fail because it is unable to fulfill your task or because your instructions were insufficient. Frequent use of AI tools for different tasks will give you a better overview and a feel for the tasks that AI excels at and for the tasks where AI fails. Experience will also help give better instructions that lead to faster and more reproducible results. 

AI policies

  • Below are links to the AI policies of many publishers and brief summaries about the most important regulations. In general, be aware that policies can quickly change and that not every use case can be easily covered by a general policy.
  • We highly recommend to check the AI policies of the journal itself; policies of a journal and of its publisher can differ in important aspects. Contact the editorial office before submitting to a journal if you have questions about the allowed use of AI at this journal. 

AI policies

  • This information serves as a first overview and can differ from journal policies, even at the same publisher. Please check submission guidelines carefully before submitting a manuscript. In case of doubt, contact the editorial office.

    Italic text in quotation marks is a direct quote from the webpage available via the URL below.

    URL

    ACS, AI policy

    AI as author

    AI technology cannot fulfill the role of an author.

    Declaration of AI use

    The use of AI tools for text or image generation should be disclosed in the manuscript within the Acknowledgment section with a description of when and how the tools were used. For more substantial use cases or descriptions of AI tool use, authors should provide full details within the Methods or other appropriate section of the manuscript.

    Spell checks

    Not specifically mentioned

    AI-generated images, figures & visual content

    Can be used in general but require declaration in the figure caption.

    AI in the research process & methodology

    Requires declaration as stated above.

    AI use by peer reviewers & editors

    Disclosing any part of the submission or the peer review report to a text generation service is not permitted.

    Author accountability & research integrity

    Accountability for the final manuscript remains with the authors.

  • This information serves as a first overview and can differ from journal policies, even at the same publisher. Please check submission guidelines carefully before submitting a manuscript. In case of doubt, contact the editorial office.

    Italic text in quotation marks is a direct quote from the webpage available via the URL below.

    URL

    APS, AI policy

    AI as author

    AI technology cannot fulfill the role of an author.

    Declaration of AI use

    Authors should disclose the use of AI tools to editors in their Cover Letter and (if desired) within the paper itself.

    Spell checks

    "Authors and Referees may use ChatGPT and similar AI-based writing tools exclusively to polish, condense, or otherwise lightly edit their writing."

    AI-generated images, figures & visual content

    Rules of good scientific conduct apply for scientific image generation. For artwork, similar guidelines might apply; this should be discussed with APS directly.

    AI in the research process & methodology

    If "the use of AI tools is in service of the study itself, the journals require authors to describe, in a reproducible manner, the use of AI tools in the methods section. This should include:

    • An explanation of how the AI or AI-assisted tools were used in the image creation or alteration process.
    • The name of the model or tool, version and extension numbers, and manufacturer."

    AI use by peer reviewers & editors

    "To protect the confidentiality of peer-reviewed materials, referees should not upload the contents of submitted manuscripts into external AI-assistance tools."

    Author accountability & research integrity

    Accountability for the final manuscript remains with the authors.

  • This information serves as a first overview and can differ from journal policies, even at the same publisher. Please check submission guidelines carefully before submitting a manuscript. In case of doubt, contact the editorial office.

    Italic text in quotation marks is a direct quote from the webpage available via the URL below.

    URL

    CUP, AI policy

    AI as author

    AI technology cannot fulfil the role of an author.

    Declaration of AI use

    "AI use must be declared and clearly explained in publications such as research papers, just as we expect scholars to do with other software, tools and methodologies."

    Spell checks

    Not specifically mentioned.

    AI-generated images, figures & visual content

    Not specifically mentioned.

    AI in the research process & methodology

    Not specifically mentioned.

    AI use by peer reviewers & editors

    Not specifically mentioned.

    Author accountability & research integrity

    Accountability for the final manuscript remains with the authors.

  • This information serves as a first overview and can differ from journal policies, even at the same publisher. Please check submission guidelines carefully before submitting a manuscript. In case of doubt, contact the editorial office.

    Italic text in quotation marks is a direct quote from the webpage available via the URL below.

    URL

    Copernicus, AI policy

    AI as author

    AI technology cannot fulfill the role of an author.

    Declaration of AI use

    "Authors should provide the name of the specific AI tool utilised and clearly describe the purpose and extent of this use. This can be done either in the Methods or in the Acknowledgements sections of the manuscript."

    Spell checks

    "AI can be used to improve sentence structure and readability of manuscripts including punctuation, grammar, and spelling checks. This assistive use of AI does not need to be declared by authors."

    AI-generated images, figures & visual content

    Image generation is permitted but requires declaration.

    AI in the research process & methodology

    Not specifically mentioned.

    AI use by peer reviewers & editors

    AI must not be used to generate referee comments but can assist with punctuation, grammar and spelling checks.

    Author accountability & research integrity

    Accountability for the final manuscript remains with the authors.

Training your own LLM

If copyrighted material can be used for LLM training is still under debate. If you plan a research project that includes LLM training contact us early on. Lib4RI has agreements with some publishers (Elsevier, Springer Nature and Wiley) that specify the conditions for using their material for LLM training. Creative Commons (CC) offers a detailed guide about using works published with CC licences for LLM training. 

If you have any questions about copyright for your text data mining / AI / LLM project, check our FAQs or contact us directly at @email.

Further reading & general information

resources