Want to share your screen? See the person you're talking to? Contact us via digital library desk! We will be with you shortly.
Monday-Friday



Want to share your screen? See the person you're talking to? Contact us via digital library desk! We will be with you shortly.
Monday-Friday
Lib4RI supports researchers at Eawag, Empa, PSI and WSL who are willing to publish articles in pure Open Access journals with a publishing fund to cover reasonable article processing charges (APCs). The fund is intended as a last resort for articles accepted for publication in eligible Open Access, peer-reviewed journals to cover fees when funds from any other source are unavailable.
Funding conditions and application process
The complete article processing charges are paid from the Open Access Fund if the following funding conditions are met:
The funding conditions have been established in consultation with the research institutions.
See also the FAQ.
Please follow the process outlined below to keep the administrative effort for you and us as low as possible:
FAQs
As the APC-funded model of OA publishing has grown, concerns have been raised over its sustainability. It is especially worrying that APCs are showing annual increases much beyond the rate of inflation. For example, the report Monitoring the Transition to Open Access (chapter 4) indicates a 16% increase in the average APC amount from 2013 to 2016 for the UK, while the Consumer Price Index rose only 5%. Data from 2005 to 2018 on the APCs paid by European institutions shows that from a mean APC of €858 in 2005, APCs have nearly doubled, to over €1600 in 2018 (Aasheim et al., 2019). These increases in APCs impose an unsustainable pressure on the budget of Lib4RI. To counteract escalating APCs, we introduced an APC cap of CHF 2500 (excl. VAT) in our Open Access Publication Fund. This is in line with the regulations of other European research institution (e.g. TU9-Guideline ; max. EUR 2000). It should also be noted that a price cap of CHF 2500 does exclude only very few, very expensive OA-Journals from funding. According to the OpenAPC database collecting data on APCs paid by European institutions, less than 5% of the OA-journals included in the database charge APCs of more than CHF 2500 (data: OpenAPC 2021).
In addition, an APC cap of 2500 CHF (excl. VAT) is also a requirement of the co-funding by the ETH Board for our Open Access Fund; see Co-funding by the ETH Board for our Open Access Fund – New APC cap.
First, an APC cap should both signal to researchers and to the publishing industry that Open Access needs to remain affordable. Partly funding APCs exceeding the APC price cap would not send this signal. Second, in most situations both parts of a “splitted APC” would ultimately be paid by Eawag, Empa, PSI or WSL. The splitting of the APC would increase the administrative effort for handling the invoice(s) and, therefore, even increase the actual costs.
Hybrid Open Access describes a publishing model where some articles are made Open Access, against the payment of an APC, while other articles remain Closed Access, and the journal as a whole is subscription-based. The problem of Hybrid Open Access is the so called “double dipping”, i.e. paying twice to publish and read the same article. Publishers collect money when subscriptions are paid by the library and once more when authors are charged an APC to make their article Open Access. If the APC for the article is funded by the Open Access Fund, the Lib4RI pays twice for the same article.
Technically, publishing an article Open Access as part of the Read & Publish agreements with Elsevier and Springer is also a form of Hybrid Open Access. However, double dipping is avoided here because reading access and Open Access publishing fees are covered by a flat fee to the publisher.
Further reading:
Mittermaier B. Double Dipping in Hybrid Open Access – Chimera or Reality? 2015.
Matthias L. The worst of both worlds: Hybrid Open Access. OpenAIRE. 2018.
There are three typical reasons why a journal is not indexed in DOAJ: